Top latest Five h4831 vs h4831sc Urban news

I am a real lover of your H4831 powder. I get great velocity and precision out of any caliber I've tried it in. In the 25-06 up for the 338 it really is my head over to powder of decision. I check out every type of powders when working up loads, although the H4831 normally appears to appear out on prime for accuracy and velocity when the case is of the 06 course or much larger.

Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the exact copy of H4831. Physically, it's a shorter grain measurement, as a result, the designation SC or short Slice. The shorter, a lot more compact kernels enable the powder to movement in the powder actions more smoothly, assisting to ease the consistent chopping of granules.

4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I found this combo generates .5MOA groups with velocity about 3020fps away from a 26" barrel. I exploit this same powder in my 300wm shooting 180gr products, so it's nice to possess a single powder for the two.

I've had a handful of rifles that fouled genuinely poor. Acquiring all the copper out was an actual PIA until I found Wipe-Out foaming bore cleaner.

IMR powders also preform properly for me with a single noteworthy exception. The many chrongraphing I have done with them suggests the velecity is consistant over 32 degrees but begins to fluctuate once the temp begins to drop. The nearer to zero I get the greater they fluctuate. I have seen just as much as 250 fps in a 10 shot string with my 243 and 223 during the Winter season time all-around listed here. Haven't observed this with some of the other powders.

Liberalism; The not possible yet accepted notion that it is totally probable to pick up a turd through the clear close.

Any person loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the final results, any data you are able to share? Must also point out I have some ELD-X one hundred seventy five's I want to test out, if you have facts on that likewise.

Anyhow, I planned to give some 7828SC a attempt to cut down several of the compression. What a mistake, I could not get this powder to shoot accurately or generate the velocities I get with normal 7828.

I could stack em in a single gap but I h4831sc wasn’t satisfied with the velocity. Right after months, I acquired Blessed and caught some H1000 on line and of course paid a bit added. The quite upcoming 7 days in a gun clearly show a man experienced a h4831 vs h4831sc complete situation of H1000 for $40 per 1lb. I neglect simply how much, but Together with the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a delicate load.

The 55grs is all of that I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I feel that they've slowed down the swift to indicate that their rifles are greater. It bug the hell outside of me. I understand superior. This is why I do not ever throw out my older manuals. I do buy new guide on a regular basis to remain up on new chambers and there loading. I exploit this 39grs in summers @ 100+ levels with none complications.

This is often an older thread, you might not get a response, and could be reviving an aged thread. Make sure you take into consideration making a new thread.

Yes, You should utilize exactly the same load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, although the SC Variation might enable you to get a tiny bit much more in predicaments in which you are maxing out case volume With all the typical powder right before achieving pressure limitations.

Southwest Idaho I attempted H4831sc in my three hundred WM but had significantly better pace and accuracy with H1000. I'd fairly make use of a slower burning powder with 215g capsules.

Certainly, sitting down all-around for twenty+ decades (I'm sure a man who remains utilizing the H4831 he acquired from the 60s), signifies that burn off costs will probably adjust a smidge, and new manufacture stuff will be somewhat various as h4831sc well.